ed_rex: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] ed_rex at 07:05pm on 16/05/2013

Nightmare In Tedium

Neil Gaiman channels Stephen Thompson

(Which is never a good thing)

Screenshot from 'Nightmare in Silver', Doctor Who copyright 2013 BBC

On more than one occasion, the writer Harlan Ellsion insisted his name be removed from a movie or television program and replaced with that of Cordwainer Bird in place of his own. He did it when he believed his script had been butchered: changed to the point where the on-screen result would in some way make him look bad. It was his way of "flipping the bird" at those who had ruined his work and, more, of protecting his own reputation as a screen-writer.

If Neil Gaiman doesn't have a pseudonym for similar circumstances, he should get one — and apply it retroactively to his sophomore entry as a screen-writer for Doctor Who.

"Nightmare in Silver" isn't the worst episode of this year's often-dreadful half-series (far from it) but it isn't very good, either.

It is almost inconceivable that the the writer of "The Doctor's Wife" (not to mention of the Sandman graphic novels) could have handed in a script as dramatically disjointed, as illogical and as frankly boring, as that which showed up on our television screens this past weekend. And surely, it wasn't Neil Gaiman who closed the episode with the appalling spectacle of the Doctor almost literally drooling as he ponders the sight of Clara in a skirt just "a little bit too tight".

A nightmare in silver? More like pewter, or even tin. Spoilers and snark, as usual.

There are 8 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
kerravonsen: The TARDIS: something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue (tardis)
posted by [personal profile] kerravonsen at 11:10pm on 16/05/2013
I really do wonder why you keep watching. Are you a masochist?
nostalgia: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] nostalgia at 11:18pm on 16/05/2013
+1 person liked this comment
ed_rex: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] ed_rex at 07:13am on 17/05/2013
I've made it quite clear, that I'm doing this because I said I would. As a writer, I made a commitment to review this damned thing and I'm seeing that out.

Do I regret it? Well, yeah. Kind of.
nostalgia: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] nostalgia at 11:19pm on 16/05/2013
I liked it, so I suppose that means you must be wrong.
nam_jai: (DW 11 <3)
posted by [personal profile] nam_jai at 03:05am on 17/05/2013
I liked it upon first viewing and loved it upon second viewing. I guess the second viewing, knowing what was happening, seemed less frenetic (it was never boring) and I was more able to relish Matt Smith's and Warwick Davis's performances in particular. I really hope Porridge makes a return appearance.
ed_rex: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] ed_rex at 07:16am on 17/05/2013
No surprise, I didn't much care for what he was given to do, but like Diana Rigg last week, I thought Warwick Davis was one of the few bright lights of the episode.

P.S. Thanks for disagreeing with me without tossing in an ad hominem.
nostalgia: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] nostalgia at 11:14am on 17/05/2013
They were great, yeah. I didn't even mind the annoying kids!
celestinenox: (Doctor Who - Rose goodbye)
posted by [personal profile] celestinenox at 01:12am on 17/05/2013
I agree that it wasn't as good as "The Doctor's Wife," but I disagree about it being boring.

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16 17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31