ed_rex: (Default)

Hmm ...

posted by [personal profile] ed_rex at 02:24pm on 08/05/2011
Re #1, I'm going to argue that my version was sufficiently vague as to get a pass, but since I'm relatively new to this community I won't argue too strenuously.

As for #2, isn't it better to let people know whether the review they're thinking of reading is positive or negative? After, shit/no shit is completely subjective, and so not spoilery.
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

Re: Hmm ...

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 02:27pm on 08/05/2011
I am unable to answer that question, as I'm the type who actively seeks out spoilers and speculation and then enjoys finding out how close we got it.

The mindset of the particularly spoiler averse is completely beyond me--I saw one person once write a long diatribe about how "Peter Parker is Spiderman" and "Tony Stark is Iron Man" are massive massive spoilers. This is roughly akin to "it's bigger on the inside" being considered a major spoiler...
[link] [parent] [reply]

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
 3
 
 4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
9
 
 10
 
 11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
16
1
 17
 
 18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
23
 
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
30
 
 31