←
→
miss_s_b: (Innuendo: well hung)
Add MemoryShare This Entry

Header Bar.

posted by [personal profile] miss_s_b at 01:44pm on 09/05/2009
Might we have a use for this:



...at some point? I have been going through my scrapbook on LJ and found it. I recall getting permission from Lee Sullivan to make it, as long as he is credited and linked to. Obviously it needs the DW comm icon rather than the LJ one, but apart from that...?
Mood:: 'busy' busy
Music:: Any Questions on Radio 4
←
→
There are 20 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 01:31pm on 09/05/2009
I like this. Header images should be like this—clearly showing what the comm is about without getting too distracted by anything else.
[link] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 01:32pm on 09/05/2009
Of course, to use it we'd need to use a hacked version of Zesty—given free comms can have a layer now, that's not an issue, want me to sort it out?
[link] [parent] [reply]
lizbee: A sketch of myself (DW: Lady President)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] lizbee at 01:33pm on 09/05/2009
Yes please! /mod hat
[link] [parent] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 09:05pm on 09/05/2009
Question: how wedded are you to this existing layout? I personally really like it, but it's incredibly inflexible.

If, OTOH, we switched to Transmogrified or simply base Core2, then I can do loads to the appearance incredibly easily without any real hacking—and it'll be a simple copy/paste job for you.
[link] [parent] [reply]
lizbee: (DW: Romana (cartoon))

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] lizbee at 11:57am on 10/05/2009
As long as it's functional and readable, I don't mind changes. I'm quite attached to back text/white backgrounds, though, as anything else seems to give me eyestrain these days.
[link] [parent] [reply]
miss_s_b: River Song and The Eleventh Doctor have each other's back (Approving)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] miss_s_b at 01:34pm on 09/05/2009
You'd have to ask [personal profile] lizbee about that; she's the admin.
[link] [parent] [reply]
lizbee: A sketch of myself (DW: Three/Jo)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] lizbee at 01:33pm on 09/05/2009
I would be totally happy to incorporate it into the comm design, provided DW's style customisation options come with detailed instructions for the simple-minded.
[link] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 01:36pm on 09/05/2009
provided DW's style customisation options come with detailed instructions for the simple-minded.

They don't. Yet. I've been drafted to help write them.

So...

If I sort the code out, then write down what you have to do, if you can't do it the instructions aren't good enough, right? Do you want this basic colour scheme/layout, or something else? I like Zesty, but I prefer non-white backgrounds, for example.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] fannishnonsense at 05:32pm on 09/05/2009
That is pretty awesome.
[link] [reply]
iskander: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] iskander at 06:20pm on 09/05/2009
What about the one who played ONE in the Five Doctors ?
[link] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 07:50pm on 09/05/2009
Looked remarkably like the forth in from the left?
[link] [parent] [reply]
iskander: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] iskander at 12:18am on 10/05/2009
Isn't that william hartnell ? The one next to him is Peter Cushing, from the films (?)
[link] [parent] [reply]
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Names)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] matgb at 12:23am on 10/05/2009
4th in from the left is One. One has been played by a number of actors, stunt doubles, lookalikes and similar but is best known as being played by Hartnell.

I see a header graphic showing all the different Doctors. I care not which actor portrayed the Doctor in any given episode, film or spin off.
[link] [parent] [reply]
infiniteviking: A smiling tiger. (3)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] infiniteviking at 02:25am on 10/05/2009
Wow, I've never seen that before. It's seriously gorgeous.

..Heee, was the Eighth really that short? And the Sixth that tall? *grins*
[link] [reply]
miss_s_b: River Song and The Eleventh Doctor have each other's back (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] miss_s_b at 09:35am on 10/05/2009
I think Lee did some actual research before drawing it, yes.
[link] [parent] [reply]
infiniteviking: A noncommital bluejay on a perch. (4)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] infiniteviking at 03:52pm on 10/05/2009
That's surely so; it's just surprising. The Eighth seemed so much taller onscreen... maybe it's the way he carried himself, or the camera angles, or something.
[link] [parent] [reply]
alienist: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] alienist at 02:31am on 10/05/2009
Oh, that's marvellous. :D ...Though I can't help but think Four should be taller.
[link] [reply]
miss_s_b: River Song and The Eleventh Doctor have each other's back (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] miss_s_b at 09:35am on 10/05/2009
I think it was one that surprised me most.
[link] [parent] [reply]
wolby: Medieval illustration of a canine holding a duck by the neck; the duck says "queck." (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] wolby at 12:10am on 22/05/2009
*pedantic mode, feel free to tl;dr...*

I did one of these myself a while ago (not nearly as nice-- I tried to edit photos, and it's surprisingly hard to find full body shots of most of them), and I actually don't think his is quite correct there. My research (mostly celebheights.com) says that both 3 and 4 are/were 6'3", where REG was 6'2", 9 is 6'1.5", and 5 & 10 are 6'1"-- so assuming the others are correct, they are too short. 5 should be an inch taller than 6, but I think it could be on account of the hair.

But McGann is totally a shorty. XD
[link] [parent] [reply]
charamei: (Default)

Holy...!

posted by [personal profile] charamei at 02:56pm on 23/05/2009
I have been looking everywhere for an image like that for so long, for fanfic and Simming purposes. And on my first day on DW...

Thanks.
[link] [reply]

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
 3
 
 4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
9
 
 10
 
 11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
16
1
 17
 
 18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
23
 
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
30
 
 31